Comparison
Blum: All Crypto – One App vs Gram of TON
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @blumcrypto | @toncoin |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 12.8M | 6.3M |
| Avg views | 119,953 | 368,500 |
| Engagement rate | 0.9% | 5.8% |
| 30-day growth | -18.4% | -11.9% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | crypto | crypto |
| Channel age | — | 3110 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@blumcrypto
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@toncoin
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.