Comparison
Catapult Extreme vs Major Community
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @catapult_extreme | @majors |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.6M | 10.2M |
| Avg views | 87,875 | 272,806 |
| Engagement rate | 1.2% | 2.7% |
| 30-day growth | -17.8% | -22.3% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@catapult_extreme
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@majors
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.