Comparison
Mehnat & Huquq vs TOSS REPORT ™
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @mehnat_huquq_uz | @toss_reports1 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 13,663 | 13,911 |
| Avg views | 4,213 | 6,574 |
| Engagement rate | 30.8% | 47.3% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | — | betting |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@mehnat_huquq_uz
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@toss_reports1
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.