Comparison
Proxy MTProto vs Roxman
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @proxymtproto | @roxman |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 11.9M | 6.5M |
| Avg views | 465,096 | 265,054 |
| Engagement rate | 3.9% | 4.1% |
| 30-day growth | -0.8% | -17.6% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | tech | crypto |
| Channel age | — | 2285 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@proxymtproto
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@roxman
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.