Comparison
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ vs Moskvada ะะพัะบะฒะฐ ัะฐะฑะพัะฐ ะดะปั ะผะธะณัะฐะฝัะพะฒ
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels โ audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐@real_toss_guruMoskvada ะะพัะบะฒะฐ ัะฐะฑะพัะฐ ะดะปั ะผะธะณัะฐะฝัะพะฒ@wildberriestov5
| Metric | @real_toss_guru | @wildberriestov5 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 12,858 | 19,644 |
| Avg views | 2,354 | 6,148 |
| Engagement rate | 18.3% | 31.3% |
| 30-day growth | โ | โ |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | โ | โ |
| Channel age | โ | โ |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics โ we have no admin access to Telegramโs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@real_toss_guru
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@wildberriestov5
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict โ see the methodology.