Comparison
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯 vs Щука VPN 🐟
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @rhymestg | @shukavpn |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.5M | 1.5M |
| Avg views | 122,302 | 105,901 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| 30-day growth | +8.1% | +13.6% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | news | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@rhymestg
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@shukavpn
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.