Comparison
ФИЧА vs Технобокс.
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @silicon_kitchen | @technbox |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.2M | 1.4M |
| Avg views | 31,289 | 92,699 |
| Engagement rate | 2.5% | 6.6% |
| 30-day growth | +28.5% | +22.1% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 220 days | 686 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@silicon_kitchen
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@technbox
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.